IfoSta - Information und
Statistik |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IfoSta -
Sport |
|
|
|
Inhaltsverzeichnis |
|
RL-20092010-Zusammenfassung |
|
RL-20102011-Kreuztabelle |
|
|
Fußball-Regionalliga
Nord |
|
|
Abschlusstabelle
- Spielzeit: 2010/2011 |
|
|
|
|
Abschlusstabelle |
Gesamtbilanz |
Heimbilanz |
Auswärtsbilanz |
|
Mannschaft |
Sp. |
g. |
u. |
v. |
|
Tore |
|
Diff. |
Punkte |
Sp. |
g. |
u. |
v. |
|
Tore |
|
Diff. |
Punkte |
Sp. |
g. |
u. |
v. |
|
Tore |
|
Diff. |
Punkte |
1. |
Chemnitzer FC |
34 |
25 |
7 |
2 |
|
82 |
: |
23 |
|
+59 |
|
|
82 |
17 |
13 |
3 |
1 |
|
43 |
: |
10 |
|
+33 |
|
|
42 |
17 |
12 |
4 |
1 |
|
39 |
: |
13 |
|
+26 |
|
|
40 |
2. |
VfL Wolfsburg II |
34 |
23 |
6 |
5 |
|
59 |
: |
28 |
|
+31 |
|
|
75 |
17 |
13 |
3 |
1 |
|
29 |
: |
14 |
|
+15 |
|
|
42 |
17 |
10 |
3 |
4 |
|
30 |
: |
14 |
|
+16 |
|
|
33 |
3. |
VfB Lübeck |
34 |
21 |
6 |
7 |
|
58 |
: |
36 |
|
+22 |
|
|
69 |
17 |
11 |
3 |
3 |
|
31 |
: |
14 |
|
+17 |
|
|
36 |
17 |
10 |
3 |
4 |
|
27 |
: |
22 |
|
+5 |
|
|
33 |
4. |
RasenBallsport Leipzig |
34 |
18 |
10 |
6 |
|
57 |
: |
29 |
|
+28 |
|
|
64 |
17 |
12 |
3 |
2 |
|
34 |
: |
15 |
|
+19 |
|
|
39 |
17 |
6 |
7 |
4 |
|
23 |
: |
14 |
|
+9 |
|
|
25 |
5. |
Hallescher FC |
34 |
16 |
10 |
8 |
|
51 |
: |
34 |
|
+17 |
|
|
58 |
17 |
8 |
4 |
5 |
|
24 |
: |
18 |
|
+6 |
|
|
28 |
17 |
8 |
6 |
3 |
|
27 |
: |
16 |
|
+11 |
|
|
30 |
6. |
Holstein Kiel |
34 |
15 |
10 |
9 |
|
65 |
: |
36 |
|
+29 |
|
|
55 |
17 |
7 |
5 |
5 |
|
38 |
: |
18 |
|
+20 |
|
|
26 |
17 |
8 |
5 |
4 |
|
27 |
: |
18 |
|
+9 |
|
|
29 |
7. |
Hertha BSC II |
34 |
15 |
7 |
12 |
|
47 |
: |
49 |
|
-2 |
|
|
52 |
17 |
8 |
5 |
4 |
|
29 |
: |
21 |
|
+8 |
|
|
29 |
17 |
7 |
2 |
8 |
|
18 |
: |
28 |
|
-10 |
|
|
23 |
8. |
Hamburger SV II |
34 |
14 |
7 |
13 |
|
57 |
: |
49 |
|
+8 |
|
|
49 |
17 |
7 |
4 |
6 |
|
35 |
: |
25 |
|
+10 |
|
|
25 |
17 |
7 |
3 |
7 |
|
22 |
: |
24 |
|
-2 |
|
|
24 |
9. |
Hannover 96 II |
34 |
13 |
7 |
14 |
|
56 |
: |
47 |
|
+9 |
|
|
46 |
17 |
7 |
3 |
7 |
|
27 |
: |
24 |
|
+3 |
|
|
24 |
17 |
6 |
4 |
7 |
|
29 |
: |
23 |
|
+6 |
|
|
22 |
10. |
Energie Cottbus II |
34 |
13 |
6 |
15 |
|
49 |
: |
51 |
|
-2 |
|
|
45 |
17 |
9 |
1 |
7 |
|
26 |
: |
19 |
|
+7 |
|
|
28 |
17 |
4 |
5 |
8 |
|
23 |
: |
32 |
|
-9 |
|
|
17 |
11. |
ZFC Meuselwitz |
34 |
12 |
6 |
16 |
|
41 |
: |
53 |
|
-12 |
|
|
42 |
17 |
8 |
3 |
6 |
|
29 |
: |
25 |
|
+4 |
|
|
27 |
17 |
4 |
3 |
10 |
|
12 |
: |
28 |
|
-16 |
|
|
15 |
12. |
1. FC Magdeburg |
34 |
11 |
8 |
15 |
|
37 |
: |
46 |
|
-9 |
|
|
41 |
17 |
5 |
4 |
8 |
|
19 |
: |
27 |
|
-8 |
|
|
19 |
17 |
6 |
4 |
7 |
|
18 |
: |
19 |
|
-1 |
|
|
22 |
13. |
SV Wilhelmshaven |
34 |
11 |
8 |
15 |
|
48 |
: |
61 |
|
-13 |
|
|
41 |
17 |
7 |
4 |
6 |
|
26 |
: |
26 |
|
+0 |
|
|
25 |
17 |
4 |
4 |
9 |
|
22 |
: |
35 |
|
-13 |
|
|
16 |
14. |
VFC Plauen |
34 |
11 |
6 |
17 |
|
43 |
: |
48 |
|
-5 |
|
|
39 |
17 |
7 |
4 |
6 |
|
26 |
: |
18 |
|
+8 |
|
|
25 |
17 |
4 |
2 |
11 |
|
17 |
: |
30 |
|
-13 |
|
|
14 |
15. |
TSV Havelse |
34 |
10 |
5 |
19 |
|
45 |
: |
67 |
|
-22 |
|
|
35 |
17 |
7 |
3 |
7 |
|
25 |
: |
22 |
|
+3 |
|
|
24 |
17 |
3 |
2 |
12 |
|
20 |
: |
45 |
|
-25 |
|
|
11 |
16. |
Eintracht Braunschweig II |
34 |
7 |
8 |
19 |
|
31 |
: |
54 |
|
-23 |
|
|
29 |
17 |
5 |
6 |
6 |
|
24 |
: |
23 |
|
+1 |
|
|
21 |
17 |
2 |
2 |
13 |
|
7 |
: |
31 |
|
-24 |
|
|
8 |
17. |
FC Oberneuland |
34 |
8 |
4 |
22 |
|
46 |
: |
77 |
|
-31 |
|
|
28 |
17 |
5 |
3 |
9 |
|
24 |
: |
32 |
|
-8 |
|
|
18 |
17 |
3 |
1 |
13 |
|
22 |
: |
45 |
|
-23 |
|
|
10 |
18. |
Türkiyemspor Berlin |
34 |
0 |
5 |
29 |
|
12 |
: |
96 |
|
-84 |
|
|
2 |
17 |
0 |
2 |
15 |
|
5 |
: |
39 |
|
-34 |
|
|
2 |
17 |
0 |
3 |
14 |
|
7 |
: |
57 |
|
-50 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
Türkiyemspor Berlin werden wegen
Verstößen im Lizensierungsverfahren drei Punkte abgezogen. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|